Jobs’s visionary
ability for understanding consumer product trends and vectors, and his ability
to motivate the hell out of people to drive them toward a goal and getting the
very best out of them, we still don’t know some of the untold story of Steve
Jobs. The Apple co-founder and ex-CEO was too complicated and nuanced for any
biographer to understand and communicate quickly.
Perhaps some of those spaces will be filled in when Ed
Catmull’s forthcoming book is published, worked with Steve for 25 years and is
someone who could add a great deal of richness and perspective to the picture
of Jobs we have now.
I have been fortunate enough to come to
know Catmull over the past several years. It’s evident when he talks about Jobs
as a person and leader is that Catmull saw him as a great partner and
collaborator. That’s a quality that rarely comes through. On the contrary, the
prevailing accounts are of Jobs the Tyrant and Jobs the Narcissistic Egomaniac.
Bouncing back
from defeat! The “Jobs” way
Like every strong leader and artistic
personality whom I’ve known or studied, Jobs needed to fail before he could
develop more accurate self-awareness and self-acceptance and finally acknowledging
what he really wanted, and a more human and authentic approach to his
leadership. I’ll leave it to Catmull and others close to Jobs to describe that
nuanced personal evolution.
Unlike at Apple, Job’s leadership style
at Pixar was far from controlling. Sure, he drove the overall strategy. Yes, he
fired sales and operations people repeatedly, as Pixar shifted its focus from
manufacturing hardware to software to producing short digital commercials and,
ultimately, to making movies.
He also invested a substantial portion
of his net worth in Pixar. And both Catmull and John Lasseter, Pixar’s chief
creative officer, came to consider Jobs their “protector.”
Together, Jobs, Catmull, and Lasseter
managed to weave technology, art, and business into a unified whole, with a
common purpose and values and an incredibly rich and creative culture. Without
any one of those three contributions, neither the company nor its films would
have come into existence. And that culture is what has differentiated Pixar
from the typical Hollywood approach — which is
to transact for talent on each project through short-term focused negotiations.
To succeed, Pixar needed Lasseter’s
innovative genius and ability to drive its creative processes and norms. It
needed Catmull’s technological prowess and leadership, which helped drive the
invention of a completely new set of technologies ranging from Pixar’s
RenderMan software to the supporting back-end systems and processes.
And of course, Pixar desperately needed
Jobs. He provided the financial resources, strategic flexibility and
motivational leadership that many companies require and a willingness to make
small bets on affordable losses, namely short animated
Link: Marketwatch
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.